﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><ttl>60</ttl><title>Austin Justice</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com</link><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:45:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:45:34 GMT</pubDate><language>en</language><copyright /><itunes:subtitle /><itunes:author /><itunes:summary /><description /><itunes:owner><itunes:name /><itunes:email>kpace@pacefirm.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" /><item><title>Police Notebook: William Deal</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/03/10/police-notebook-william-deal.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>&lt;strong&gt;Officer:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; William Deal .&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Agency:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Austin Police Department.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alleged Misconduct:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Theft of an electric razor from HEB.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Disciplinary Action:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Unknown (APD internal investigation ongoing).&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Other Information:&lt;/strong&gt; Deal was arrested in Williamson County on 2/18/10 and released the next day on $1,000 bond.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Source:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; This &lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/03/08/austin_police_officer_arrested.html?cxntfid=blogs_the_blotter"&gt;Statesman article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description><category>Police Notebook</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/03/10/police-notebook-william-deal.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">fbaf0a8a-2217-4a80-ae14-a2beb5b74d10</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:27:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Warrant Roundup Begins Saturday</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/03/04/warrant-roundup-begins-saturday.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>FROM AUSTIN MUNICIPAL COURT:&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Law enforcement agencies from more than 250 agencies across Texas will begin making arrests Saturday, March 6, as part of the Great Texas Warrant Roundup. This major, multi-jurisdictional push kicked off Feb. 19 with the mailing of thousands of notices warning people with outstanding warrants of the impending arrest effort. The last day to clear warrants is Friday, March 5, before the concentrated effort to make arrests begins.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For more information, including online payment instructions, see &lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/03/04/great_texas_warrant_roundup_be.html?cxntfid=blogs_the_blotter"&gt;this Statesman article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also worthy of note is that Austin Municipal Court's policy is to not arrest people with active warrants who go there to take care of business.&lt;/p&gt;</description><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/03/04/warrant-roundup-begins-saturday.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">d49d3f95-3519-4f54-8ce5-477468be5377</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:33:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>New government loophole for open records requests.</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/03/03/new-government-loophole-for-open-records-requests.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>Criminal defense attorneys and other government watchdog types who use open records requests to obtain information suffered a recent setback. In &lt;a href="http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/HTMLopinion.asp?OpinionID=2001511"&gt;City of Dallas v. Abbott&lt;/a&gt;, the Texas Supreme Court addressed the government's deadline for complying with such requests and gave the government a new loophole.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the past, the government had a strict 10-day deadline for complying with open records requests. If the request was vague or overly broad, the government could seek clarification but the clock stopped running only until the clarification was provided. Now, however, the government's deadline will be extend by 10 days.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That may not seem like such a big deal but the concern is that government officials may use the loophole to improperlydelay the release of information in time-sensitive situations in order to avoid accountability. Such concerns seem well-founded in light of the government's history in this arena, which is what led to the legislature to impose the strict deadline in the first place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lawyer Bill Christian, who has represented the Austin American-Statesman on open records matters, has the following &lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/local/texas-high-court-resets-clock-on-records-requests-298914.html?cxtype=rss_local"&gt;suggestions for avoiding improper delays with open records requests&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&amp;#8226; Be as specific as possible so there are no grounds for seeking clarification. Don't ask for "all documents" or "all records" unless it's for a narrow, well-defined category.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;#8226; Make specific, narrow and numbered requests so that it's more difficult for the agency to claim that the requests are vague.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;#8226; If you know what you are asking for, identify that document specifically as one of the numbered list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;#8226; When a government agency seeks clarification, reply as quickly as possible with a narrowing or clarifying explanation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><category>Case Law</category><category>Open Records</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/03/03/new-government-loophole-for-open-records-requests.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">af9706c4-5277-4b58-b3cd-e63b487ed82e</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:11:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Police Notebook: Sgt. Nedith Torres (APD)</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/03/03/police-notebook-st-nedith-torres.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>&lt;strong&gt;Officer:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Sgt. Nedith Torres.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Agency:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Austin Police Department.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alleged Misconduct:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Sgt. Torres assaulted his wife then lied about it during the subsequent investigation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Disciplinary Action:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Sgt. Torres was fired in August 2008. He appealed and the arbitrator reversed the firing, despitefinding that the allegations were true. APD filed a lawsuit last Friday to challenge the decision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Other Information:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; As a result of the incident, Sgt. Torres was originally arrested for Assault Family Violence, a Class A misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail and a fine not to exceed $4,000. He ultimately pled guilty to a reduced charge of Class C Assault, presumably as part of a plea bargain agreement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Source:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; This &lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/local/police-officials-sue-over-arbitrators-reversal-of-officers-293091.html?cxtype=rss_local"&gt;Statesman article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><category>Police Notebook</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/03/03/police-notebook-st-nedith-torres.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">865b4058-39a2-4e37-a5aa-2c25d92c7e9a</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:52:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>No Refusal Mardi Gras</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/02/11/no-refusal-mardi-gras.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>APD has announced "No Refusal" Mardi Gras here in Austin this Saturday (2/13/10) and Tuesday (2/16/10) from 9 p.m. on each day to 5 a.m. the following morning. That means that the police will seek blood warrants for people who are stopped and investigated for DWI and refuse to submit to a breath test. For more information see &lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/02/11/police_announce_norefusal_for.html?cxntfid=blogs_the_blotter"&gt;this Statesman article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2/15/10 Update.&lt;/strong&gt; 21 people were arrested in the first leg of No-Refusal Mardi Gras. Of those, 7 consented to breath tests and 14 were subjected to blood warrant testing. See &lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/02/14/apd_21_dwi_arrests_on_no_refus.html?cxntfid=blogs_the_blotter"&gt;this Statesman article&lt;/a&gt; for more.&amp;nbsp; Remember, the second leg is coming up this Tuesday evening.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2/19/10 Update.&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; 20 people were arrested during the Fat Tuesday portion of No-Refusal Mardi Gras. That figure includes 4 voluntary breath tests and 16 blood warrants. See &lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/02/17/apd_20_dwi_arrests_on_no_refus.html?cxntfid=blogs_the_blotter"&gt;this Statesman article&lt;/a&gt; for more.&lt;br&gt;</description><category>Events</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/02/11/no-refusal-mardi-gras.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">9a69b50d-4b4a-4be5-a4e4-e21fd53be0db</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:19:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Fire Investigation</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/02/05/fire-investigation.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>D.A. Confidential has a &lt;a href="http://daconfidential.blogspot.com/2010/02/q-firse-investigator.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DAConfidential+%28D.A.+Confidential%29"&gt;great interview with an Austin Fire Department Fire and Arson Investigator&lt;/a&gt;, which includes a pretty detailed explanation of how a typical arson investigation is conducted and a discussion of telltale signs that an accelerant may have been used.&lt;br&gt;</description><category>Forensics</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/02/05/fire-investigation.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">1f7ceccc-9c3a-4558-9079-c177986c89fb</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:18:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>No Refusal Super Bowl</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/02/05/no-refusal-super-bowl.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>APD has announced a "No Refusal" Super Bowl, from this Sunday (2/7) at 9 p.m. until Monday (2/8) at 5 a.m. For more (including a little regurgitation of police propaganda), see this &lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/02/05/apd_announces_no_refusal_on_su.html?cxntfid=blogs_the_blotter"&gt;Statesman article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2/9/10 Update.&lt;/strong&gt; Eighteen people were arrested during No-Refusal Super Bowl Sunday. Ten of those arrested provided breath samples voluntarily, warrants were issued to draw blood from seven people, and one is under investigation. For more, see this &lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/02/08/18_arrested_on_dwi_charges_sup.html?cxntfid=blogs_the_blotter"&gt;Statesman article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><category>Events</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/02/05/no-refusal-super-bowl.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">8dfc478c-a5ef-4ca8-b3a3-3994ff9bd106</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:53:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Definition of "commercial instrument" (Shipp v. State).</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/29/definition-of-commercial-instrument-shipp-v-state.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>&lt;a href="http://www.txccablog.com/2010/01/issues-granted-allen-ray-shipp-v-state.html"&gt;According to the Texas Court at Appeals blog&lt;/a&gt;, the CCA will take up the issue of whether forgery of a "commercial instrument" includes a store receipt.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Sixth Court of Appeals (Texarkana) didn't think so, limiting the definition to instruments that affect a legal relationship or convey some sort of future benefit, and excluding a store receipt because it simply memorializes a transaction that has already occurred. Here's the court of appeals opinion: &lt;a href="http://www.6thcoa.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/HTMLOpinion.asp?OpinionID=9944"&gt;Allen Ray Shipp v. State&lt;/a&gt;.</description><category>Case Law</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/29/definition-of-commercial-instrument-shipp-v-state.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">7c671996-16d3-4f69-b5ae-f4338c34d415</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Representing the Wretched</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/28/representing-the-wretched.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>I've written about &lt;a href="http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2009/12/06/representing-the-guilty.aspx"&gt;representing the guilty&lt;/a&gt;. Now, &lt;a href="http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2010/01/awesome-indeed.html"&gt;via Defending People&lt;/a&gt; and from &lt;a href="http://rantsofapublicdefender.blogspot.com/2010/01/we-rock.html"&gt;Preaching to the Choir&lt;/a&gt;, I've come across a wonderful treatment of &lt;a href="http://rantsofapublicdefender.blogspot.com/2010/01/we-rock.html"&gt;representing the wretched&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
So I was perusing an internet comment board this afternoon.  (I know, I know.  Stay away, those internet message boards are filled with crazies.  Nothing good comes from reading, etc.  I know.  Meryl's staging an intervention, but in the meantime, I learn interesting things about the general populace.)
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, I found this comment on an article about a capital murder case:
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The Constitution does a lot to protect fools, the undeserving, and pieces of human trash.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Reading that made me grin.  I felt all warm and fuzzy inside.  And I said with pride, "Hell, yeah, it does!"
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I'm willing to wager that's not the reaction the writer was expecting.  Based on context, I'm fairly confident the writer wrote those words with a rueful shake of the head and a sense of outrage that the Constitution does protect those folks.  I suspect the writer would think it not such a bad thing if we added an asterisk to the Bill of Rights indicating these rights do not apply to fools, the undeserving, and pieces of human trash.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
But, me, I think it's awesome.  (Yes, I'm a lawyer with an extensive vocabulary and that is the word I choose.)  It's easy to respect the rights of the pretty people, the popular ones, the charming folk, the nice guys.  No one's going to run roughshod over Mr. Rogers' rights.  We probably don't need a Constitution to protect the Prom Queen.  It's the assholes we need to write the rules for.  It's harder to treat them well, to be fair to them, to refrain from punching them.  So 200-some years ago, we wrote a contract with ourselves to make sure we would always respect the rights of the worst among us.  
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
It's easy to treat the good people well.  But the true measure of our character is how we treat the bad ones.  We choose to treat them fairly and with respect.  And I think it's awesome.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Here's that link again from &lt;a href="http://rantsofapublicdefender.blogspot.com/2010/01/we-rock.html"&gt;Preaching to the Choir&lt;/a&gt;, in case you think this is as "awesome" as I do.&lt;br&gt;</description><category>Ethics</category><category>Prosecutorial Misconduct</category><category>Police Misconduct</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/28/representing-the-wretched.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">3b86e99e-4d65-42c5-a376-27c85d705f0d</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:47:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Touch DNA</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/27/touch-dna.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>Via an &lt;a href="http://gritsforbreakfast.blogspot.com/2009/12/dna-could-solve-burglaries-if-crime.html"&gt;old Grits for Breakfast post&lt;/a&gt;, I came across this &lt;a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=experts-touch-dna-jonbenet-ramsey&amp;amp;print=true"&gt;Scientific American article about Touch DNA&lt;/a&gt; that I want to preserve.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to the article, this method of testing can detect the slightest bit of genetic material and was used to clear Jon Benet Ramsey's family of any involvement in her death. Those poor, poor people. Can you imagine being put through all of that after your child is brutally murdered?&lt;br&gt;</description><category>Forensics</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/27/touch-dna.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">4ed77d61-0124-4de3-be77-8b37376e3fb0</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:15:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Police Notebook: Former Sgt. Michael Olsen (APD)</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/26/police-notebook-former-sgt-michael-olsen-apd.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>&lt;strong&gt;Officer:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Former Sgt. Michael Olsen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Agency:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Austin Police Department.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alleged Misconduct:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Excessive use of force and demonstration of poor judgment and tactics, leading to the fatal shooting of a man in 2007.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Disciplinary Action:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Fired.&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Other Information:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Currently under investigation by APD for
improper use of force against a 13-year-old in a private security
capacity. Olsen is the Austin branch manager for a private security
company that coordinates and assists patrols at about 60 apartment
complexes (including the East Austin apartment complex that is the site
of the 2007 shooting), strip centers and other sites throughout the
city.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Source:&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; This &lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/01/26/olsen_under_investigation_amid.html?cxntfid=blogs_the_blotter"&gt;Statesman article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description><category>Police Notebook</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/26/police-notebook-former-sgt-michael-olsen-apd.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">89e300a3-2749-4a2e-abf4-4c904af81e8e</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:58:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Update re. Briscoe v. Virginia (SCOTUS)</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/26/update-re-briscoe-v-virginia-scotus.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>Back in November, I &lt;a href="http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2009/11/02/upcoming-criminal-justice-issues-in-the-scotus.aspx"&gt;posted the following blurb&lt;/a&gt; about a case on this month's argument calendar in the SCOTUS:&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=Briscoe_v._Virginia"&gt;Briscoe v. Virginia (07-11191)&lt;/a&gt; — Scope of crime lab analysts’ role in a criminal trial; sequel to &lt;a href="http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=Melendez-Diaz_v._Massachusetts"&gt;Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts&lt;/a&gt;,on Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights. The Melendez-Diaz case,which was decided earlier this year, requires the prosecution, when itpresents a lab report as evidence in a criminal trial,&amp;nbsp;to make theanalyst who prepared it available for cross-examination by defensecounsel. Sadly, the 5-4 decision may already be in jeopardy. &lt;a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/new-lab-report-case-granted/"&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thankfully, the SCOTUS &lt;a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/09pdf/07-11191.pdf"&gt;remanded Briscoe (pdf)&lt;/a&gt; for further proceedings "not inconsistent with" the &lt;a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08pdf/07-591.pdf"&gt;Melendez-Diaz opinion (pdf)&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1/29/10 Revision.&lt;/strong&gt; Changed category from "Cases of Note" to "Case Law."&lt;br&gt;</description><category>Case Law</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/26/update-re-briscoe-v-virginia-scotus.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">fbe91e3d-8f95-4d64-b1dc-e140854e57bf</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:44:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bennett's 16 Simple Rules for Jury Selection</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/26/bennetts-16-simple-rules-for-jury-selection.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>&lt;a href="http://www.astcweb.org/public/publication/article.cfm/1/22/1/16-Simple-Rules-for-Better-Jury-Selection"&gt;Mark Bennett's tips for jury selection&lt;/a&gt;, published by &lt;a href="http://www.astcweb.org/public/publication/index.cfm/January/2010/22/1/35"&gt;The Jury Expert&lt;/a&gt;, are definitely worth preserving.&lt;br&gt;</description><category>Practice Tips</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/26/bennetts-16-simple-rules-for-jury-selection.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">3246cf36-dbb3-46f2-b552-7de6d295f168</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:29:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Seven Bullshit Police Myths Everyone Believes (Thanks to Movies)</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/21/seven-bullshit-police-myths-everyone-believes-thanks-to-movies.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>Came across this amusing but mostly true rundown of &lt;a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_18385_7-bullshit-police-myths-everyone-believes-thanks-to-movies_p2.html"&gt;seven bullshit police myths&lt;/a&gt;. The myths it debunks are the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Myth #7. Forensic Science is Magic&lt;br&gt;Myth #6. The Insanity Defense Lets You Get Away With Murder&lt;br&gt;Myth #5. Not Talking To Cops Equals Obstruction of Justice&lt;br&gt;Myth #4. Undercover Cops Have To Identify Themselves If Asked&lt;br&gt;Myth #3. Tracing a Call Takes a Long Time&lt;div id="Title_box"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;Myth #2. Criminals Must Be Read Their Miranda Rights or They Will Go Free&lt;div id="Title_box"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;Myth #1. Everyone Gets One Free Phone Call&lt;div id="Title_box"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;Follow this link for an &lt;a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_18385_7-bullshit-police-myths-everyone-believes-thanks-to-movies_p2.html"&gt;entertaining and informative explanation for why these are strictly myths&lt;/a&gt; (note that it contains a paranoid big-brother-is-listening-through-our-cell-phone theory that I'm not sold but otherwise seems accurate and is definitely worth a read.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1/26/10 Editing Note:&lt;/strong&gt; Added a line to (hopefully) clarify that the list alone isn't what's worth reading; you really need to follow the link.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><category>Humor</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/21/seven-bullshit-police-myths-everyone-believes-thanks-to-movies.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">87025390-44fa-4645-9f9e-c81ffc7f132e</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:35:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>"Unpaid" suspension is a misnomer.</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/17/unpaid-suspension-is-misnomer.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>When an police officer's misconduct results in "unpaid suspension," he probably isn't being punished as much as you think. That is because officers are allowed to use vacation time and other forms of leave to cover the gap. As a result, such suspensions rarely result in lost wages. See this &lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/local/apd-officers-can-get-paid-during-unpaid-suspension-179749.html?cxtype=rss_news_36716"&gt;Statesman article&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;for more.</description><category>Police Misconduct</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/17/unpaid-suspension-is-misnomer.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">b2e56801-ad2b-45d0-af7b-33015476231d</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:46:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Mismanagement results in new police commander position.</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/17/mismanagement-may-result-in-new-police-commander-position.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>Earlier this month, I posted a &lt;a href="http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/03/police-notebook-lt-wayne-demoss-apd.aspx"&gt;Police Notebook entry about APD's Lt. Wayne Demoss&lt;/a&gt;, who was appealing a decision by Chief Art Acevedo to deny Demoss a promotion to the rank of commander because he had visited a brothel during a December 2007 trip to Panama, where prostitution is legal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Demoss didn't deny that he'd visited the brothel but claimed that the purpose of the visit was merely to satisfy his curiosity about such establishments and that he didn't actually pay for sex (okay, Clinton). Whatever the truth is, he won his appeal.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, Patrick Ockletree was promoted to fill the open commander position. Loathe to make Demoss wait for another opening or demote Ockletree through no fault on his part, the city council decided that the only logical thing to do was create a new police commander position just for Demoss.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In case you were wondering, the typical annual salary for an Austin police commanders is $113,000.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For more, see these Statesman articles:&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/texas/arbitrator-austin-police-chief-was-wrong-to-bypass-121295.html?cxtype=rss_news"&gt;Arbitrator: Austin police chief was wrong to bypass officer for promotion&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.statesman.com/news/local/council-poised-to-create-new-police-commander-position-177951.html?cxtype=rss_news_36716"&gt;Council poised to create new police commander position&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</description><category>Police Misconduct</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/17/mismanagement-may-result-in-new-police-commander-position.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">c3d372cc-e9ea-4912-8a3b-2d3827151d7a</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:37:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Police Notebook: Sgt. Craig Martin (APD)</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/17/police-notebook-sgt-craig-martin-apd.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>&lt;STRONG&gt;Officer:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; Sgt. Craig Martin&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Agency:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; Austin Police Department&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Alleged Misconduct:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Arrested for illegal use or inhaling glue or paint in December 2009 by Kyle police and again in January 2010 by Cedar Park police.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Other Information:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; Martin supervises &amp;nbsp;current assignment is &amp;nbsp;currently is assigned to supervise detectives in South-Central Austin. He has been placed on restricted duty. .&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Disciplinary Action:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; Martin was placed on restricted duty at some point prior to January 13, 2010 (presumably as a result of the first arrest) but was still in a supervisory position. Further disciplinary action is unknown.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Source:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; This &lt;A href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/01/13/austin_sergeant_arrested_twice.html?cxntfid=blogs_the_blotter"&gt;Statesman article&lt;/A&gt;.</description><category>Police Notebook</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/17/police-notebook-sgt-craig-martin-apd.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">df3aff09-ea5f-4543-9314-6f746dc6e72d</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:37:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Police Notebook: Leonardo Quintana (APD)</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/17/police-notebook-leonardo-quintana-apd.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>&lt;STRONG&gt;Officer:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; Leonardo Quintana&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Agency:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; Austin Police Department&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Alleged Misconduct:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Arrested in Williamson County on January 12, 2009, for Driving While Intoxicated.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Other Information:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; Quintana fatally shot Nathanial Sanders II,&amp;nbsp;an 18-year-old boy, at an East Austin apartment complex in 2008.&amp;nbsp;A federal civil rights lawsuit, brought against Quintana by the decendent's family, is currently pending. Quintana was suspended for 15 days in relation to the incident for not activating his patrol-car camera but was found to have complied with the department’s use-of-force policy.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Disciplinary Action:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; Unknown.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Sources:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; This &lt;A href="http://www.dailytexanonline.com/top-stories/apd-officer-quintana-arrested-for-dwi-1.2135657"&gt;Daily Texan article&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;and this &lt;A href="http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/01/12/officer_in_fatal_shooting_char.html?cxntfid=blogs_the_blotter"&gt;Statesman article&lt;/A&gt;.</description><category>Police Notebook</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/17/police-notebook-leonardo-quintana-apd.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">e39656a1-c770-467c-a733-c9bc68869687</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:29:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Judge Lynch</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/15/judge-lynch.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>D.A. Confidential has a &lt;A href="http://daconfidential.blogspot.com/2010/01/q-and-with-judge-mike-lynch.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DAConfidential+%28D.A.+Confidential%29&amp;amp;utm_content=Google+Reader"&gt;great interview with Judge Mike Lynch&lt;/A&gt;, the presiding judge of the &lt;A href="http://www.co.travis.tx.us/courts/criminal/district/167.asp"&gt;167th District Court&lt;/A&gt; of Travis County. Some highlights:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"I do not like sending people to the penitentiary, especially young people with their whole lives in front of them. It may be necessary and appropriate to [e]nsure&amp;nbsp;community safety, but I still consider it an overall failure."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"A good prosecutor has a good understanding of human nature and an ability to read and understand people. ...He or she must also have empathy and a sense of compassion that allows for fair resolution of cases even when he or she is holding all the cards. Great prosecutors have all the above qualities plus great trial skills."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"A criminal defense attorney, to be really effective, needs essentially the same traits as [a prosecutor plus he] must be able to adapt quickly, be flexible in his approach to a case or trial, and instinctively know when he needs to bluff or play it straight. These are important because often the defense attorney is fighting an uphill battle with fewer resources, fewer professional witnesses, and with the evidence stacked against him."</description><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/15/judge-lynch.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">f4f8c290-a3e6-4bc6-aaea-d78a451a513f</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:41:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Unsolicited Feedback</title><link>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/09/unsolicited-feedback.aspx?ref=rss</link><dc:creator>Kiele Linroth Pace</dc:creator><description>I liked the &lt;A href="http://www.bureauofcommunication.com"&gt;Bureau of Communication&lt;/A&gt; forms so much, I made one of my own (click for full-sized version):&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;

&lt;a href="http://www.pacefirm.com/download/feedback.jpg"&gt;&lt;IMG border="0" src="http://www.pacefirm.com/download/feedback-sm.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a</description><category>Humor</category><comments>http://austinjustice.pacefirm.com/2010/01/09/unsolicited-feedback.aspx#Comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">4e7921b9-aadb-47aa-acc6-9c80cbb6583c</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 20:22:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>